Method Comparison Studies in Analytical Method Development

1) Purpose

The purpose of this SOP is to outline the procedure for conducting method comparison studies during analytical method development, ensuring equivalence between different analytical methods.

2) Scope

This SOP applies to all personnel involved in method comparison studies for analytical method development projects within the analytical development department.

3) Responsibilities

The purpose of this SOP is to define the roles and responsibilities of all personnel involved in method comparison studies.

4) Procedure

1. Study Design:
   1. Define objectives and acceptance criteria for method comparison studies.
   2. Select appropriate reference methods and experimental designs.
2. Sample Preparation:
   1. Prepare samples according to predefined procedures and ensure homogeneity.
   2. Label samples to maintain traceability throughout the study.
3. Experimental Execution:
   1. Perform analytical testing using the methods under comparison.
   2. Ensure consistent experimental conditions and replicate analyses as necessary.
4. Data Analysis:
   1. Compare results obtained from different methods using statistical methods (e.g., correlation, regression analysis).
   2. Assess agreement between methods and evaluate biases, if any.
5. Conclusion and Reporting:
   1. Draw conclusions based on method comparison data and statistical analyses.
   2. Document study findings in a comprehensive report, including method comparison protocols, raw data, and conclusions.
6. Review and Approval:
   1. Review the method comparison report for accuracy, completeness, and compliance with regulatory requirements.
   2. Obtain necessary approvals from stakeholders before finalizing and implementing method changes.

5) Abbreviations, if